Friday, February 19, 2016

The US government against Apple: cooperate with the FBI, rejection is a marketing choice – Il Sole 24 Ore

History of the article

Close

This article was published on February 19, 2016 at 21:36 hours.
the last change is the 19 February 2016 at 22:09.

NEW YORK – The US government passes counterattack against Apple and Silicon Valley. The Department of Justice has filed a new legal request to the judiciary to immediately force the company to unlock the iPhone found in possession of one of the bombers of San Bernardino. And he denounced the security concerns of the privacy and security of users cited by CEO Tim Cook as the result of marketing strategies and attempts to misrepresent the facts.

Federal prosecutors have triggered the new move today, even before that is that Apple to deposit by Friday next planned an appeal against the first instance decision of the judge Sheri Pym had given reason to the federal authorities. “Apple seems to oppose his objections on the basis of the combination of a perceived negative impact on the business model, reputation and have indicated in their exposed on marketing strategy.” And, they added, it is guilty of “numerous erroneous characterizations of the obligations of the order and a misunderstanding of the law.” Doing so would choose to “publicly repudiate” the decision of the judiciary “Instead of assisting the efforts to fully investigate a deadly attack.”

Cook had published an open letter in recent days to warn of a “dangerous precedent” if Apple was required to comply with the request to decrypt the iPhone 5C terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook. The company claims that the government, using an obsolete law of the eighteenth century, would that would create de facto a “back door” that can violate the smartphone protection. A solution “too dangerous” because once created would expose all consumers to future abuses or crimes by pirates.

The dispute has seen take the field other hi-tech American protagonists, starting with Google, alongside Apple who has since assumed influential legal teams for their own defense. He has assumed the character of a broader clash between national security and privacy issues, from creeping time and is now exploded into the open. MPs Republicans have also threatened to propose new laws criminalizing the resistance of companies to demands for “open” to the authorities their technologies and their products.

Meanwhile, it arrives in court battle between Apple and FBI. A federal court in California has in fact set for March 22 the hearing on the case, as was announced by a spokesman of the prosecution. Apple has said it would continue on its line and by next Friday should deposit in court its formal response.



Permalink

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment