When you say consistency: “people find it normal not only sharing more information in different ways, but in a more open and widespread. For this social rules are just something that changes over time. Privacy will not last long. ” How true must have thought hackers. The era of privacy then the newspapers ran stories. Six years after pontificate on the Crunchies Awards in San Francisco (11 January 2010), Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook, left the password “dadada” to his Twitter account. How to put a latch grandmother to a security door. Yesterday it emerged that a group of hackers – hidden under the name OurMine – has split the bolt and has flooded the Twitter account actually into disuse.
shadow carousel
Mark Zuckerberg (in costume) and the first bath of Max
Account vip violated
The skill of Zuckerberg as a developer it is out of the question: the best scene of “the social Network movie” is one in which, to reply to the accusations of having “stolen” the idea, responds with arrogance that Facebook has done him because only he was capable of it. But when you become the youngest billionaire in history is right come under the spotlight. Because, if it is true what the hackers have leaked, it would be the same password that Zuckerberg had used for his LinkedIn profile, and which had already been taken away with a trawl of the Internet in 2012, along with another 100 million profiles. “We believe a lot in data encryption,” he had said the same Zuckerberg last February to take to support the Apple in the vexed question that contrasted the FBI is right or not to force the iPhone to a terrorist? If crypto data but leave the door open is good for nothing they could have him explain in a basic course in corporate security.
shadow carousel
The 25 worst passwords, the ones that you should never use
Who manages billions of other shareholders should be more careful
the contradiction is this: his is just the latest of Vip account violated in this period. And some of them belonged to the security standards, inviolable people in the common imagination. In addition to Twitter and LinkedIn in his case also they were infringed profiles Pinterest and Instagram. All more or less dormant, like that of Google services. It is easy to imagine that Zuckerberg has opened them just to try them at first, and then forget about it. But it is also true that those who manage billions of other shareholders should show a little more careful.
Facebook: No Marc account is in danger
Facebook announced that no account of the founder appears to have been put in danger. How to say I am not questioning Facebook and, above all, WhatsApp, in full safety campaign (have you noticed that when you use it will appear on a written admirable virtues of encrypted communications?). Figure out how much truth there is in the countryside of the hackers is costly, even if account hijacking Twitter has not been denied. Perhaps because it is a competitor, in his small, in which Zuckerberg for accounts: in his book on Twitter, Nick Bilton, a former columnist for the New York Times, described how the founder of Facebook had tried to buy Twitter in its infancy to make her die in the cradle. But this is conspiracy. The bottom line is that no one can truly feel safe in using the digital account. They know hackers. It is familiar to the network society. It also knows Zuckerberg. Of course, relying on Dadaism to protect yourself is a bit ‘naive.
June 7, 2016 (edited June 7, 2016 | 10:12)
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
No comments:
Post a Comment